D!srupt
Return to D!srupt

D!srupt · Moonshot Factory

The Moonshot Opportunity Workshop.

From possibility to a credible next move.

Artificial intelligence and emerging technologies are creating no shortage of ideas. The harder challenge is deciding which ideas are worth pursuing.

The Moonshot Opportunity Workshop is a focused executive working session for organizations that want to identify where new technology, new operating models, or new forms of intelligence could create meaningful value.

§ 001The Problem

Activity is not the same as direction.

Leaders are being presented with new tools, new capabilities, and new claims almost daily.

Ideas are emerging across departments. Vendors are making promises. Employees are already experimenting. Boards and executive teams are asking what the organization plans to do next.

But without a disciplined process for evaluating opportunity, organizations risk:

  • Chasing technology without a meaningful business case
  • Launching disconnected pilots that never scale
  • Overlooking opportunities that sit between departments
  • Investing before understanding the real problem
  • Treating efficiency as the only source of value
  • Becoming stalled by uncertainty, risk, or competing priorities

The workshop creates the space and structure needed to make a better decision.

§ 002The Workshop

Not another technology workshop.

This is not

  • A generic AI education session
  • A software demonstration
  • A technology assessment
  • An open-ended brainstorm
  • A vendor selection exercise
  • A detailed implementation plan
  • A traditional strategic planning retreat

This is

A structured executive process for identifying where meaningful opportunity exists, challenging the strongest ideas, setting priorities, and defining one experiment worth pursuing.

“The objective is not to produce more ideas. The objective is to determine which ideas deserve attention, investment, and action.”
§ 003The Inquiry

We begin with the organization, not the technology.

The session begins with the organization itself: its ambitions, pressures, customers, employees, operations, constraints, and future.

  1. 01

    Where is the organization experiencing its greatest friction?

  2. 02

    What is becoming slower, harder, more expensive, or less effective?

  3. 03

    Where is valuable knowledge trapped?

  4. 04

    Which decisions are delayed by incomplete information?

  5. 05

    Where could the customer or employee experience be fundamentally improved?

  6. 06

    What could the organization offer that was not previously possible?

  7. 07

    Which assumptions may no longer be valid?

  8. 08

    What opportunity feels too ambitious for the normal planning process?

Technology is introduced only where it helps unlock a meaningful possibility.

§ 004The Process

From friction to experiment.

  1. 01

    Establish the Context

    Clarify the strategic pressures, ambitions, constraints, and decisions shaping the organization.

  2. 02

    Map the Friction

    Identify the operational, customer, workforce, data, and decision-making challenges that may represent meaningful opportunity.

  3. 03

    Expand the Possibilities

    Explore how artificial intelligence, emerging technology, new workflows, new services, or new business models could change what is possible.

  4. 04

    Challenge the Ideas

    Test the strongest opportunities against strategic value, feasibility, readiness, differentiation, risk, and learning potential.

  5. 05

    Set Priorities

    Determine which opportunities should be pursued now, explored further, monitored, or stopped.

  6. 06

    Define the Experiment

    Translate the highest-priority opportunity into a practical, testable next move.

The central question

“What is the smallest credible experiment that would help the organization make a better decision?”
§ 005The Outcome

Clarity, not another pile of ideas.

At the conclusion of the engagement, the organization receives a concise Moonshot Opportunity Brief designed to support real executive decision-making.

  • 01

    A clear summary of the strategic context

  • 02

    The most significant areas of friction and unrealized potential

  • 03

    A prioritized portfolio of opportunities

  • 04

    A recommendation on where to focus first

  • 05

    A one-page charter for the recommended experiment

  • 06

    Immediate next steps for the following 30 days

A closer look

The Experiment Charter.

A one-page instrument that translates the priority opportunity into something an organization can actually run.

  • The problem or opportunity being addressed
  • The intended users or beneficiaries
  • The core hypothesis
  • The expected value
  • The initial scope
  • The data and capabilities required
  • Ownership and potential partners
  • Key risks
  • Success indicators
  • Learning objectives
  • The decision to be made at the end of the experiment
§ 006The Right Moment

Built for organizations that know something must change.

  • Know AI or emerging technology may matter but are unsure where to begin

  • Have generated ideas but have not established priorities

  • Want to move beyond generic use cases and incremental efficiency

  • Are considering new products, services, experiences, or operating models

  • Need an outside perspective before making a significant investment

  • Want to test an opportunity without committing to a large transformation

  • Suspect an important opportunity exists but have not yet articulated it

The workshop can be tailored for executive teams, boards, business units, municipalities, universities, nonprofits, and ecosystem partners.

§ 007Why D!srupt

We do not begin with a predetermined answer.

D!srupt works at the intersection of strategic inquiry, emerging technology, organizational design, and experimentation.

We do not begin with a platform, product, or vendor solution. We begin with the questions that matter.

  • 01

    What is changing?

  • 02

    What is no longer working?

  • 03

    What might now be possible?

  • 04

    What deserves to be tested?

Our role is to help leadership teams see beyond the immediate technology conversation, challenge assumptions, identify opportunities others may miss, and determine what should happen next.

§ 008Select an Engagement

Choose the depth of inquiry.

Three ways to engage D!srupt, shaped by the complexity of the decision in front of you.

The Moonshot Session

Best forA leadership team that needs clarity around a specific challenge, opportunity, or strategic question.

Includes

  • One leadership intake conversation
  • Workshop preparation
  • Three-hour facilitated executive session
  • Concise Moonshot Opportunity Brief
  • One executive follow-up conversation
Participants
5–8 leaders
Investment
$3,500

Most Selected

The Opportunity Intensive

Best forAn organization facing multiple opportunities, competing priorities, or a more complex strategic decision.

Includes

  • Leadership intake
  • Review of relevant strategic materials
  • Up to three stakeholder interviews
  • Half-day facilitated executive session
  • Prioritized opportunity portfolio
  • Detailed experiment charter
  • Executive follow-up conversation
Participants
5–10 leaders
Investment
$5,000

The Moonshot Partnership

Best forAn organization that wants support moving from opportunity identification into experiment design and initial activation.

Includes

  • Everything in the Opportunity Intensive
  • Deeper experiment design
  • Two follow-on working sessions
  • Partner, platform, or capability mapping
  • Initial 30-day activation roadmap
  • Ongoing executive advisory access during the engagement
Investment
Starting at $8,500

Every engagement begins with a conversation. Selecting one below opens a short inquiry so we can determine whether it's the right fit.

The future rarely arrives as a fully formed plan.

It begins with a better question.

The Moonshot Opportunity Workshop helps leadership teams identify what matters, challenge what they assume, and determine what deserves to happen next.

See the opportunity. Challenge the assumption. Design the experiment.